Main Street Monroe | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Community Issues
 The Voice
 Letter from the Middletown Chamber

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Message:

* HTML is ON
* Forum Code is OFF
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Tracy Posted - 12/22/2008 : 2:34:16 PM
This is a letter from the Middletown chamber president sent to Monroe businesses about the ST RT 63 extension. I have redacted the name of the business out of the letter.



Attn: Monroe Businesses

We mailed to you last week a one page survey that we respectfully ask you to complete and return to our office (fax 422-6831) by Monday, Dec 29 concerning the proposed extension of state route 63 to the West from the present terminus at Route 4 to Route 127 on the far side of Trenton.

The chamber is trying to measure the impact, if any, of such a project on Monroe businesses and whether or not, in general, you favor the project.
It has been envisioned for some time that the completion of this road project would open up an efficient logistical connection to and from the West and stimulate increased retail, commercial, and residential growth along the route plus provide a more efficient connection to Interstate 70 to the West and Northwest.

Butler County recently made this project one of its top two infrastructure priorities for the upcoming federal stimulus package consideration. It is important that we assess the opinions of the Monroe business community.

Every business that participates in this survey will be given a copy of the summary results.

Thank you, Bill Triick

The Chamber of Commerce
Serving Middletown, Monroe and Trenton
513.422.4551
Looking for a chamber member business, want to make reservations for a chamber event or program, want to learn about a chamber committee? Visit The Chamber web site at www.thechamberofcommerce.org
18   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
summerlover Posted - 12/22/2008 : 6:22:24 PM
slappy, just keep waiting buddy!
She said something about Santa delivering it himself!

quote:
[i]Originally posted by slapshot[/i]
[br]No the special people get invited to the New Years Eve bash at Froggy's. LOL

*shivering still waiting by the mailbox for my invite*

ADH Posted - 12/22/2008 : 6:05:30 PM
We're not in the Chamber, so I'm not sure how they got our email address.
Eagle Posted - 12/22/2008 : 5:55:08 PM
OH GOOD POINT!


quote:
[i]Originally posted by slapshot[/i]
[br]No the special people get invited to the New Years Eve bash at Froggy's. LOL

*shivering still waiting by the mailbox for my invite*

slapshot Posted - 12/22/2008 : 5:53:05 PM
No the special people get invited to the New Years Eve bash at Froggy's. LOL

*shivering still waiting by the mailbox for my invite*
Eagle Posted - 12/22/2008 : 5:49:44 PM
Oh only the "Special People" Eh?
LOL
slapshot Posted - 12/22/2008 : 5:48:21 PM
Because I am the contact person for my company and the chamber.
Eagle Posted - 12/22/2008 : 5:47:37 PM
I havent received anything concerning this. And how did they get your email address?
slapshot Posted - 12/22/2008 : 5:46:33 PM
Yeah I recieved the letter last Friday and got the email today.
Doc Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:49:24 PM
quote:
[i]Originally posted by John Beagle[/i]
[br]No funding + No support = No Extension

Exactly!

Houndog Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:43:43 PM
Didn't the county request a sum of around 165 million dollars from the state for this project recently?
John Beagle Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:31:21 PM
No funding + No support = No Extension
ADH Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:31:00 PM
We received this email today, but had not received the letter that was mentioned. It was the first we had heard of it.
Doc Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:30:17 PM
Seems like an appropriate last name for such a venture, don't ya think?
Bob Kelley Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:27:05 PM
Not to mention, there is no funding for the project. Mr Triick expects Monroe to pay full price for the section which includes construction and maintenance of a bridge. It would also change all of the TIS (traffic impact studies) studies that have been done for 63 and related projects. Those would result in more lanes, more turn lanes, more traffic through town the majority of which would be heavy truck traffic. Monroe would be expected to shoulder the expense for all of that.
Tracy Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:20:04 PM
That is correct John as we had a vote of no support of that project in the early part of 08.
John Beagle Posted - 12/22/2008 : 3:18:01 PM
I believe the official position on this issue is that Monroe is against the extension.
Tracy Posted - 12/22/2008 : 2:49:12 PM
The addition to St RT 63 would be in the township to the west of Monroe and in to Trenton and over to the ST RT 127. The Chamber President has also supported this project. The Project would require money spent from all Cities/Townships along the route including Monroe.

The position of the chamber and Bill is that this would be good for Monroe. We would be able to get more products to ST RT 75 from Trenton and at some point more businesses would locate in Monroe helping our economic growth. As we already have ST RT 63 though our community, I am not sure how this would help us in Monroe.

Eagle Posted - 12/22/2008 : 2:37:18 PM
Is any part of the 63 project in Middletown or are they just starting to promote Monroe now that they were dropped?

MainStreetMonroe.com Terms of Use © MainStreetMonroe.com Go To Top Of Page

 Advertising Information

About the Editor: John Beagle started Main Street Monroe in 1998, he also started  a b2b company, Rentacomputer.com in 1987, Middletown USA in 2002, Computer Service Now in 1990, Camera Security Now in 1999, Xponex Media in 2003, and the Tech Army Organization in 2004.